Sydenham Town Forum

My BH has written to the co-op suggesting they resume operations on the site.

She was copied in on correspondence when the matter was transferred to their area guy who deals with Sydenham.

No further response - yet.

The members and officers could have elected to grant permission and then clarify the two issues highlighted in their rejection. In another application not 1m miles away on Kirkdale, a Change of Use application, which had no Noise Survey or Impact statement included, was granted, with these condition...

Concur wholly with Jon's view.

He has done exceptionally well to secure NR's approval and consent for the sites and in very short order.

I echo his view - why is Chris Best being asked - is her approval a pre-requisite or am I mis-reading the poster's intent ?

An update posted on se23.life Fairly conclusive evidence that the TMO has been made and debunks "a policeman said" story. ThorNogsonVerified16h ThorNogson and after a quick search, this is the public record showing that the traffic order was duly made and published by Lewisham. Unless anyo...

Some update information on Traffic Management Orders related to the 20mph matter posted on se23.life over the weekend. jgdohertyVerified23h1 And here is a starter for ten on 20mph TMO’s https://www.lewisham.gov.uk/myservices/transport/road-safety/Pages/20mph-borough-speed-limit.aspx2 A table in the ...

Absolutely JMLF. You are to be congratulated on your progress. Maintain the momentum - there is plenty of time to finesse and finalise design. From the Forest Hill debate - it was quickly identified that awaiting better weather to carry out the works was also a key factor in fixing when the work cou...

The station wall probably belongs to the infrastructure owner - and that is Network Rail (NR). They have been key in granting consent on other mural projects associated with their walls and bridges and would on this occasion be the first point of contact. NR may consider that as this location is an ...