We have an answer
CB in another place on 15 July wrote: But as always, these allegations were concealed by technical means and I could not see them. I am more anxious than ever to know what is being said.
The purpose of FlavaBaker was not to provoke; not to attack, but simply to see statements made against me on Twitter, statements visible to most other accounts local to SE23. Statements causing real harm to me and the community forum I’d put so much time and effort into building.
I regret the underhand nature of this Twitter account. In hindsight it was a mistake but at the time I didn’t know how to find out what was being said about me and the forum. This Twitter account was never going to harm anyone, and never going to mislead any consumer into any kind of transaction. But it reflects poorly on my character. I bitterly regret this, after building the forum as a force for good. I hope my mistake doesn’t damage the great work that others have put into SE23.life
Whilst the account was not genuine, every thing else posted here is, and the email received posted above is real. The person involved searched online for photos of my mother, mother-inlaw, my house and mentioned my wife and child whilst saying she might pay my street a visit. I realise setting up the account was not correct, but nothing excuses threats to my young family like this.
So it turns out my paranoia over the attacks was warranted, but this comes as a cold comfort given the consequences of this whole situation.
So he lied about the existence of Flava Baker. He lied about having been granted access to the Flava Baker accounts. And he lied about the purpose of getting that access - namely to potentially share the data with the police and incriminate another member of our community. These actions far outstrip his previous worsts, namely the publication of long lists of accusations of infringements that only existed in the unprincipled perceptions of CB.
Along with another CB acolyte on SE23.life postulating that a multiple identity used to represent an organisation compared with the presence of a personal identity represents sock-puppetry and this mea-culpa
from CB himself these are unprecedented times.
I had planned to make the point that Flava Baker has no substance and in reality does not exist, except in CB's foggy farrago, seems to be gaining traction. But we know have his confirmation. So what else has he not been open or transparent about.
But in keeping with the high moral ground we all occupy here - I forgive them for they knowst not what they do.
Not so long ago then after a misguided attack on Rachael by CB and his Norfolk wingman, they colluded and combined to re position and/or lose 54 posts to hide their idiotic and juvenile actions. I swear I recall the attacks being described as like being savaged by a blancmange. Watch this space - what rabbit may be pulled out of the hat there next?