The Censor in RTW Speaks Again

Wear your anorak proudly here! The place to discuss website & forum developments, administration, wish-lists, bugs, abuse etc

Moderator: frenzarin

JGD
Posts: 890
Joined: 5 Feb 2018 11:39
Location: Perry Hill, SE6 (yup - that's Bellingham Ward and includes Bell Green which is NOT in Sydenham)
Contact:

Re: The Censor in RTW Speaks Again

Post by JGD »

stuart wrote:
9 Jul 2020 12:26
I had a negative view of you and his other critics.
Oh how most people, who have not encountered one, are sceptical and smile or laugh when the concept of red-mist attacks are explained to them for the first time.

The laughter stops when it happens to them. Most times for the most minimal or imperceptive of reasons and at such speed they don't see it coming.

Mr Beach has twenty to thirty interlocutors recounting and sharing their experiences of these forms of attack at his hands on these pages and on other local forums. Most have the good sense, often conducted in acts of self-preservation, to disengage quickly and make no further contact with Mr Beach.

Their now cynical laughter is testament to perhaps why the communities have to find the wisdom to prevent this predator from harming it further.

Alternatively everyone who is not an acolyte walks away and lets all Mr Beach's platforms die on the vine.

DickWynne
Posts: 16
Joined: 21 Jul 2019 10:15

Re: The Censor in RTW Speaks Again

Post by DickWynne »

Nic wrote:
27 Jun 2020 17:00
I really don’t want to have to go back to the police about her behaviour, but I will if necessary, and this time I will elect to press charges rather than have the police issue a warning as they did last time.
I don’t often get here but just dropped by and I see Chris Beach is still demonstrating that the only thing worse for him than being talked about is not being talked about. I’m hardly even a bit player in the Nic saga — my intro to it was being taken by Chris as an idiot looking for a village in his forgeing of police reports regarding her (see somewhere in the sockpuppets thread). To give him (dubious) credit, he can be quite convincing and it worked for a few hours. Anyway let me put on record here that it was me who accompanied Nic to the police station to help her get to the bottom of these ‘reports’ and I was there when, after an exhaustive search, the police confirmed that no complaint against Nic by Chris had ever been recorded by any force, let alone any warning being issued. I think we can believe the police in this matter. I forget whether an online utterance can be slander or libel, but Chris’s repeated assertion that Nic received a police warning would appear to be one or the other.

[25.7.20] Chris has pounced on the above post by email to me in terms predictably both flattering and patronising (to someone some 30 years his senior*) and accusatory of my apparently being duped by Nic. I don’t know Nic, having met her only once, and I have no interest in the ill-advised online shenanigans of both of them, but I am interested in Chris’s betrayal of the community he purports to serve with such probity on se23.life, and his apparent falsification of evidence. He now claims his police report is supported by that established organ of legal record, Twitter. Not sure what happened to the redacted, official-looking document and email he tried on me before. I have not engaged with him other than to request he delete my se23.life account which I stopped using over a year ago and which he used to PM me.

* I should add that wisdom does not always come with age; sometimes age comes all by itself.
Last edited by DickWynne on 25 Jul 2020 15:50, edited 2 times in total.

JGD
Posts: 890
Joined: 5 Feb 2018 11:39
Location: Perry Hill, SE6 (yup - that's Bellingham Ward and includes Bell Green which is NOT in Sydenham)
Contact:

Re: The Censor in RTW Speaks Again

Post by JGD »

DickWynne wrote:
24 Jul 2020 19:19
To give him (dubious) credit, he can be quite convincing and it worked for a few hours. Anyway let me put on record here that it was me who accompanied Nic to the police station to help her get to the bottom of these ‘reports’ and I was there when, after an exhaustive search, the police confirmed that no complaint against Nic by Chris had ever been recorded by any force, let alone any warning being issued. I think we can believe the police in this matter. I forget whether an online utterance can be slander or libel, but Chris’s repeated assertion that Nic received a police warning would appear to be one or the other.
Good for you Dick.

And for the solid reinforcement of Nic's honest protestations that Mr Beach's falsehoods were an utter fabrication formed in his warped imagination.

Given the confession made by him that he fabricated the account using that Flava Baker name and Mr Beach tried to justify why he lied and continues to lie about what he published using that account, it is astonishing that any or either of the police services he allegedly engaged with, did not choose to examine whether he was at least (or best), wasting police time.

There may be matters to be examined by police that scrutinises whether a criminal case can be made where a predatory stalker used a platform of lies fabricated by him to persecute someone with whom he had a disagreement and contrived to falsely incriminate that person. There is a long track record of examples of his previous and ongoing behaviours of false fabrications, concoctions, persecutions and intimidations of others with whom he has had even the slightest of fall-outs. The forging of police reports which were not in fact made and the showing to others of forged copies of the falsified reports, would certainly not stand well if the police were to become aware of the actualite and investigate events.

For those who still consider themselves a friend of Mr Beach or at least retain some affinity for him, they would serve him best by telling him to stop.

Of course in normal circumstances, a reasonable person would respond directly to the many appeals to stop that have already been made.

As you observe Dick, the only response is the issue of further empty and futile threats by Mr Beach.

Post Reply