It has been brought to my notice that Mr Beach in another of his multiple (and not-too-secret) guises in Twitter is expressing his view that local trolls are poisoning what he describes elsewhere as "competing forums" in our locality.
It is evident that it is a major frustration to Mr Beach that admins on other forums will not ban these alleged trolls.
Just as Mr Beach has endured being banned by every admin from every forum that he does not own for miles around us here.
From Mr Beach's hyperbole it is also clear that he has failed to grasp that his accusatory use of the word trolls is mis-applied somewhat. Some may argue the contrary - it is not trolls, Mr Beach, who are tired of you, it is the wider, more sensible members of the communities whose forums you have poisoned that tire of your expressions in the form of incessant whingeing and unrepresentative and dogmatic views.
A series of valid questions arise.
Why does Mr Beach have so many identities on Twitter?
It is reported that there are 20 to 30 accounts which Mr Beach controls. We know from his public statements that he alleges he created sock-puppet accounts to enable him to find out what issues another user may or may not have been posting about. This self-confessed self-justified act may have had in fact a different purpose for Mr Beach. Has he fabricated this scheme as an act of entrapment based on Mr Beach's construct of a fabric of lies created only by him? Does he still believe he was justified? Does he still hold to the false belief that the police issued a warning based on his fabrication?
Even Mr Beach's acolytes are now mainly silent when he continues to repeat the false allegation that he is still under an attack that in fact never existed except in the warped mind of a poisoner. Evidence perhaps of the diminution of the support he - and all of his dying .life
forums - has in a community that is reaching the conclusion that it is prudent and wise not to listen to someone who cannot lift himself out of the cess pit.
For all Mr Beach's public condemnations of the "leftist mobs" (can he possibly mean us) why is it he feels he must have so many different identities on a media stream he has such manifest distaste for? Could it be the case that his multiple identities are used to generate inward links to his failing .life
handiwork thus falsely inflating the traffic-counts to make them at least appear viable? Mr Beach's forum being deemed credible is a different matter within the target communities. Is there anyone left who still sees that as being achievable?
Why is it Mr Beach chooses to set hares running by suggesting there is something questionable about Nathan Bowen's art (and does not have the courage to define what Mr Beach means by questionable)?
Why is it Mr Beach cannot answer a question accurately when he was asked about him writing to Network Rail requesting information on whether permissions had been granted for their site to be used for that art? Did Mr Beach contact NR? To the rest of us It's a simple yes or no answer.
Perhaps it is because this unreliable man knows no better and fails to see the need to desist and "does not agonise about his inability to do so".